Skip to content
taadom digital
Services · 04

Evaluations

Independent pre-, mid-, and post-deployment evaluations of digital health tools – including dashboard audits, performance reviews, and usability assessments.

Overview

Evaluations only have value when they are honest. We do not evaluate tools we built, we do not soften findings to match expectations, and we publish methodology alongside conclusions. Independence is structural, not promised.

What's included

Concrete deliverables, not vague promises.

  • Pre-deployment readiness reviews
  • Mid-implementation learning reviews
  • Post-deployment performance evaluations
  • Process and usability evaluations
  • Dashboard and analytics audits
  • Independent reporting designed for donors, boards, and Ministries
Typical clients
  • – Implementers (NGO and government)
  • – Donor agencies and programme funders
  • – Government agencies running digital health investments
  • – International organisations with African operations
Commercial model

Project-based, scoped to the evaluation question. Independence is structural – we do not evaluate tools we built.

Example outcomes

What this kind of engagement has produced.

Outcomes shown below are anonymised. Specific clients are not named without explicit permission.

01

Independent post-deployment evaluation that identified the three workflow changes responsible for an underperforming dashboard's low usage – and the two that, when fixed, doubled adoption.

02

Readiness review that surfaced an absent change-management plan before a $1M+ digital tool roll-out, preventing a predictable launch failure.

Want to start a evaluations engagement?

Send us a short message about what you're trying to do. We respond within 2 business days.